A620 — Evaluation de l'architecture / Architecture Evaluation

A620 — Evaluation de l'architecture / Architecture Evaluation

Macroscope Artifact: A620 Service: Assurance qualite LeanIX Mapping: functionalSuitability, technicalSuitability, qualitySeal

Evaluation Context

  • Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Evaluator: [Name and role]
  • Scope: [What is being evaluated — application portfolio, technology landscape, specific domain]
  • Evaluation Criteria Reference (A610): [Link to evaluation criteria document]

Application Functional Suitability Assessment

Rate each application against the business capabilities it supports:

Application (A250) Business Capability (A200) Functional Suitability Notes
[App name] [Capability name] perfect / appropriate / insufficient / unreasonable [Assessment rationale]

Functional Suitability Scale (LeanIX standard)

  • perfect — Meets all current and future needs
  • appropriate — Meets current needs
  • insufficient — Does not meet current needs
  • unreasonable — Unfit for purpose

Technical Suitability Assessment

Rate each application and IT component for technical quality:

Element Type Technical Suitability Notes
[Name] Application / ITComponent fullyAppropriate / adequate / unreasonable / inappropriate [Assessment rationale]

Technical Suitability Scale (LeanIX standard)

  • fullyAppropriate — Excellent technical quality
  • adequate — Acceptable technical quality
  • unreasonable — Poor technical quality
  • inappropriate — Completely unfit

TIME Model Classification

Based on Business Criticality x Technical Suitability, classify applications:

Application Business Criticality Technical Suitability TIME Classification Recommended Action
[App name] missionCritical / businessCritical / businessOperational / administrativeService [score] Tolerate / Invest / Migrate / Eliminate [What to do]

Technology Lifecycle Risk

IT Component Current Lifecycle Vendor Lifecycle Risk Level Applications Affected
[Component] active / phaseOut / endOfLife active / endOfLife / extendedVendorSupport High / Medium / Low [List of dependent apps]

Quality Seal Status

Fact Sheet Current Seal Completeness % Action Required
[Name] DRAFT / APPROVED / BROKEN_QUALITY_SEAL [0-100%] [What needs to be done]

Findings Summary

Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)

  1. [Finding — impact — recommended action]

Important Issues (Plan Within 6 Months)

  1. [Finding — impact — recommended action]

Observations (Monitor)

  1. [Finding — context]

Recommendations

Priority Recommendation Affected Elements Estimated Effort Related Solution (A100)
1 [What to do] [Apps/components affected] [Relative size] [SOL-NNN if exists]

This artifact validates architecture quality. Findings feed into A100 (Enterprise Solutions) for remediation planning.